|
|
题目在
- h H3 H# J* I ], P. u) Phttp://www.aswetalk.org/bbs/blog-1753-7898.html
$ W7 Z9 t$ n) q# x. z+ v7 d( w9 G1 i
这回不明白的地方多了。还请高手指点:3 G" c) E5 d g$ K
/ \# F3 h+ L0 G1.不知道。 高低中音什么的一点都不知道。不过解题思路就是找可能的组合个数。7 P, j# o' s3 h3 X8 ?+ W z+ L
. W y' d+ _' k4 [$ M# J; p6 g. c& z9 m
2 well, I can reason a bit from the names of these optimization types. The advantage of randomized optimization is for looking for global minimum without being trapped by a local minimum (which is often the case for deterministic optimization). so far (a few years ago before I left school, to be accurate) optimization is cursed by dimensionality, and random optimization has only limited success. 5 x% G- F% x) u. F: H; Y
+ J! Z/ t9 E1 Y( T
3. 没听说过傅里叶空间插值。如果有的话也不奇怪。那么像实空间插值类似,傅里叶空间插值能准确复原已知频率的结果。别的还有什么呢?
2 g2 X4 e5 Z4 L K
5 y0 {/ F6 O5 K6 x4.不知道。我只知道复数比较奇妙。有个柯西定理,复函数如果一阶可导,则无穷阶可导。这在实函数是不可能的。; |! M& G5 R) w9 B3 a+ X% _ j
可是本质区别是什么哪?: N1 ?( L& [2 M
% D) Z+ h' j4 n; f# r5.一样大。9 H# b+ ?# H5 k7 u' Q! g
; |+ N. }. m2 R" e: k6.蒙特卡洛的实质?我也不知道。它的误差是 O(1/sqrt(N)), N是sample个数。& L/ p+ w! b( ]2 D" ?+ a! l1 _* y
6 t. L9 A4 B! `$ ^1 { |
|