|
|
题目在; R) m+ @; z, c4 Q( w
http://www.aswetalk.org/bbs/blog-1753-7898.html
5 d2 r3 B& T) J. Q
, X$ c+ Z, j, h- i0 v4 ]这回不明白的地方多了。还请高手指点:8 a' b) Z: {& O i
. ~) I0 b4 _; H1.不知道。 高低中音什么的一点都不知道。不过解题思路就是找可能的组合个数。
& R# m* ~, w5 @8 @2 ]$ o
0 j5 f4 `, W0 _) x% k. e4 s0 T2 well, I can reason a bit from the names of these optimization types. The advantage of randomized optimization is for looking for global minimum without being trapped by a local minimum (which is often the case for deterministic optimization). so far (a few years ago before I left school, to be accurate) optimization is cursed by dimensionality, and random optimization has only limited success.
3 g" S+ ]( A) U) S9 O8 _) Z- N; Z* I3 M! K6 I' P
3. 没听说过傅里叶空间插值。如果有的话也不奇怪。那么像实空间插值类似,傅里叶空间插值能准确复原已知频率的结果。别的还有什么呢?
/ ~- X9 G1 S$ f5 e' q
/ ^6 w6 ?4 O( i1 K, a5 N4.不知道。我只知道复数比较奇妙。有个柯西定理,复函数如果一阶可导,则无穷阶可导。这在实函数是不可能的。# \3 S2 y& Q6 [ C# V4 f' a
可是本质区别是什么哪?
+ r( {, E) J; x+ n" G2 W9 _( M
, `9 ^3 y/ G6 V% K, V+ ]" @5.一样大。/ s7 e! I8 Q, [
8 y9 o2 I5 |% I" Q6.蒙特卡洛的实质?我也不知道。它的误差是 O(1/sqrt(N)), N是sample个数。 w& e+ Z! A$ @2 }' I8 \5 P
8 I8 e" u$ V4 d& T5 v: W& ` |
|