设为首页收藏本站

爱吱声

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 12568|回复: 147
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[其他] 关于美国法庭听证结束 美国司法部与孟晚舟达成协议一事

  [复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    跳转到指定楼层
    #
     楼主| 发表于 2021-9-25 05:12:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
    这里是它的美国法庭相关原文:

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/h ... nancial-institution

    Department of Justice
    Office of Public Affairs
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Friday, September 24, 2021
    Huawei CFO Wanzhou Meng Admits to Misleading Global Financial Institution
    Meng Enters into Deferred Prosecution Agreement to Resolve Fraud Charges
    The Chief Financial Officer of Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Wanzhou Meng, 49, of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), appeared today in federal district court in Brooklyn, entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and was arraigned on charges of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, bank fraud and wire fraud.

    “In entering into the deferred prosecution agreement, Meng has taken responsibility for her principal role in perpetrating a scheme to defraud a global financial institution,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Nicole Boeckmann for the Eastern District of New York. “Her admissions in the statement of facts confirm that, while acting as the Chief Financial Officer for Huawei, Meng made multiple material misrepresentations to a senior executive of a financial institution regarding Huawei’s business operations in Iran in an effort to preserve Huawei’s banking relationship with the financial institution. The truth about Huawei’s business in Iran, which Meng concealed, would have been important to the financial institution’s decision to continue its banking relationship with Huawei. Meng’s admissions confirm the crux of the government’s allegations in the prosecution of this financial fraud — that Meng and her fellow Huawei employees engaged in a concerted effort to deceive global financial institutions, the U.S. government and the public about Huawei’s activities in Iran.”

    “This Deferred Prosecution Agreement will lead to the end of the ongoing extradition proceedings in Canada, which otherwise could have continued for many months, if not years,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Mark J. Lesko for the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “We are enormously grateful to Canada’s Department of Justice for its dedicated work on this extradition and for its steadfast adherence to the rule of law.”

    “Financial institutions are our first line of defense in maintaining the safety and security of the U.S. financial system,” said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “That is why the law requires that companies who avail themselves of the U.S. financial system provide financial institutions with truthful information about their business operations. Meng Wanzhou, CFO of Huawei Technologies, admitted today that she failed to tell the truth about Huawei’s operations in Iran, and as a result the financial institution continued to do business with Huawei in violation of U.S. law. Our prosecution team continues to prepare for trial against Huawei, and we look forward to proving our case against the company in court.”   

    “Meng's admissions are evidence of a consistent pattern of deception to violate U.S. law,” said Assistant Director Alan E. Kohler Jr. of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. “The FBI will continue to aggressively investigate companies doing business in the United States when there are signs they behave with contempt for our laws.”

    The Scheme to Defraud Financial Institutions

    According to court documents, and as agreed to by Meng in the DPA’s statement of facts, Skycom Tech. Co. Ltd. (Skycom) was a Hong Kong company that primarily operated in Iran. As of February 2007, Skycom was wholly owned by a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (Huawei), Hua Ying Management (Hua Ying). In November 2007, Hua Ying transferred its shares of Skycom to another entity that Huawei controlled, Canicula Holdings (Canicula). At the time Hua Ying transferred its Skycom shares to Canicula, Meng was the Secretary of Hua Ying.

    In February 2008, after Huawei transferred ownership of Skycom from Hua Ying to Canicula, Meng joined Skycom’s Board of Directors, which was comprised of Huawei employees. She served on the Board until April 2009. After Meng departed from Skycom’s Board, Skycom’s Board members continued to be Huawei employees, Canicula continued to own Skycom, and Canicula continued to be controlled by Huawei. As of August 2012, Huawei included Skycom among a list of “other Huawei subsidiaries” in Huawei corporate documents written in English.

    Between 2010 and 2014, Huawei controlled Skycom’s business operations in Iran, and Skycom was owned by an entity controlled by Huawei. All significant Skycom business decisions were made by Huawei. Moreover, Skycom’s countrymanager – the head of the business – was a Huawei employee. Individuals employed by Skycom believed they worked for Huawei.

    During the same time period, Huawei employees engaged with a U.K. staffing company to provide engineers in Iran to support Skycom’s work with Iranian telecommunications service providers. Negotiations and contracting on behalf of Skycom were conducted by Huawei employees. To pay for these contractors, Huawei sent at least $7.5 million to the U.K. staffing company in a series of approximately 80 payments from Skycom’s bank accounts in Asia, including at a multinational financial institution (Financial Institution 1), to the U.K. staffing company’s account in the United Kingdom. The transactions were denominated in U.S. dollars and cleared through the United States.

    In December 2012 and January 2013, various news organizations, including Reuters, reported that Skycom offered to sell “embargoed” equipment from a U.S. computer equipment manufacturer in Iran in potential violation of U.S. export controls law, and that Huawei had close ties with Skycom. In a statement to Reuters published in a December 2012 article, Huawei claimed that Skycom was one of its “major local partners” in Iran. Reuters reported that Huawei had further stated that “Huawei’s business in Iran is in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations including those of the U.N., U.S. and E.U. This commitment has been carried out and followed strictly by our company. Further, we also require our partners to follow the same commitment and strictly abide by the relevant laws and regulations.”

    In January 2013, a subsequent Reuters article reported that Meng served on the Board of Directors of Skycom between February 2008 and April 2009 and identified other connections between Skycom directors and Huawei. The article also quoted the following statement from Huawei: “The relationship between Huawei and Skycom is a normal business partnership. Huawei has established a trade compliance system which is in line with industry best practices and our business in Iran is in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations including those of the UN. We also require our partners, such as Skycom, to make the same commitments.” This statement was incorrect, as Huawei operated and controlled Skycom; Skycom was therefore not Huawei’s business “partner.”

    After these articles were published, Financial Institution 1 and other global financial institutions that provided international banking services to Huawei (collectively, the “Financial Institutions”), including U.S. dollar-clearing, made inquiries to Huawei in response to the above-described press reports. In early 2013, Huawei employees represented to the Financial Institutions that Skycom was just a local business partner of Huawei in Iran and that Skycom had not conducted Iran-related transactions using its accounts at the Financial Institutions.

    To address the allegations in the news reports, Huawei requested an in-person meeting with a senior Financial Institution 1 employee. That meeting occurred on Aug. 22, 2013 in Hong Kong, at which time Meng met with an executive of Financial Institution 1 responsible for operations in the Asia Pacific region. During the meeting, Meng delivered a PowerPoint presentation written in Chinese, which was translated by an interpreter into English. Meng stated that she was using an interpreter to be precise in her language.

    In her presentation, Meng stated, among other things, that Huawei’s relationship with Skycom was “normal business cooperation” and “normal and controllable business cooperation,” and she described Skycom as a “partner,” a “business partner of Huawei,” and a “third party Huawei works with” in Iran. Those statements were untrue because, as Meng knew, Skycom was not a business partner of, or a third party working with, Huawei; instead, Huawei controlled Skycom, and Skycom employees were really Huawei employees. It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to know that Huawei controlled Skycom.

    In addition, Meng stated that Huawei “was once a shareholder of Skycom” but had “sold all its shares in Skycom.” Those statements were untrue, because, as Meng knew, Huawei had “sold” its shares to an entity that Huawei controlled. Specifically, Huawei transferred Skycom shares from a Huawei subsidiary (Hua Ying) to another entity that was controlled by Huawei (Canicula). It would have been material to Financial Institution 1 to know that Skycom was transferred from one Huawei-controlled entity to another.

    Finally, Meng stated that Huawei “operates in Iran in strict compliance with applicable laws, regulations and sanctions” and that “there has been no violation of export control regulations” by “Huawei or any third party Huawei works with.” These statements were untrue because Huawei’s operation of Skycom, which caused the Financial Institutions to provide prohibited services, including banking services, for Huawei’s Iran-based business while Huawei concealed Skycom’s link to Huawei, was in violation of the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560. Moreover, between 2010 and 2014, Huawei caused Skycom to conduct approximately $100 million worth of U.S.-dollar transactions through Financial Institution 1 that cleared through the United States, at least some of which supported its work in Iran in violation of U.S. law, including $7.5 million for Iran-based contractors from the U.K. staffing company to do work in Iran.

    At no point during or after the meeting did Meng, who was aware of Huawei’s public statements about Skycom in Reuters, retract or amend any of those statements. Moreover, Huawei’s Treasurer, who also attended the August meeting, did not correct or amend any of the statements made by Meng.

    Shortly after the meeting between Meng and Financial Institution 1, Huawei prepared an English version of the PowerPoint presentation at Financial Institution 1’s request. Meng later arranged for a paper copy of that PowerPoint presentation to be delivered to the Financial Institution 1 executive she had met with in September 2013. The representations in the English version of the PowerPoint presentation closely tracked the ones Meng had made during the meeting.

    After the meeting and subsequent to receipt of Meng’s PowerPoint presentation, Financial Institution 1 decided to continue its relationship with Huawei. The other Financial Institutions similarly continued their respective relationships with Huawei.

    The DPA

    Under the terms of the DPA, Meng has agreed to the accuracy of a four-page statement of facts that details the knowingly false statements she made to Financial Institution 1. Meng also has agreed not to commit other federal, state or local crimes. If Meng breaches the agreement, she will be subject to prosecution of all the charges against her in the third superseding indictment filed in this case. The government also agreed to withdraw its request to the Ministry of Justice of Canada that Meng be extradited to the United States.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alexander A. Solomon, Julia Nestor, David K. Kessler, Sarah M. Evans and Meredith A. Arfa for the Eastern District of New York; Trial Attorneys Laura Billings and Christian Nauvel for the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section; and Trial Attorneys Thea D. R. Kendler, David Lim and R. Elizabeth Abraham of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case. Valuable assistance was provided by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Brian Morris and Brendan King of the Eastern District of New York’s Civil Division and Associate Director John Riesenberg, Attaché Andrew Finkelman of U.S. Embassy Paris and former Trial Attorney Margaret O’Malley of the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs.

    Attachment(s):
    Download Meng DPA and Statement of Facts
    Topic(s):
    Financial Fraud
    Counterintelligence and Export Control
    Component(s):
    Criminal Division
    Criminal - Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section
    National Security Division (NSD)
    USAO - New York, Eastern
    Press Release Number:
    21-925
    Updated September 24, 2021
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2016-2-18 04:19
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    116#
    发表于 2021-10-15 22:53:00 | 只看该作者
    南京老萝卜 发表于 2021-9-28 04:18
    我看到的东西是这样,不是美国不许中国和伊朗做生意的问题,而是华为做出承诺,不把美国的东西(HP的受限 ...

    这么说的话,孟的确没罪,有罪的是华为,毕竟是华为签的最终用户协议,也不是孟签的。
    美国抓不到孟的头上,如果孟当时只是代理商,而不是华为的法人。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情

    2016-8-25 23:25
  • 签到天数: 6 天

    [LV.2]筑基

    115#
    发表于 2021-10-3 01:36:49 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-10-2 20:14
    美国没保密,保密的是天朝的网上万里长城。华为自己都说了,孟的供词如何如何。假使孟没承认的话,华为的 ...

    就像网友说的,
    孟:事情是我干的,你咬我啊。
    美:好,你等着。
    然后孟女士一分罚款也不交,坐着中国的包机,大使作陪,飞回祖国接受万民敬仰。
    旁边一群猴子上蹿下跳:孟晚舟你摊上大事了,你必然损失惨重。华为你摊上大事了,你必然损失惨重。
    吃瓜群众:知道啦,知道啦。被软禁三年,损失当然惨重。被美国倾力打压两年多,消费者业务市场份额从坐二望一变成其他,损失当然惨重。请继续你的表演。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情

    2016-8-25 23:25
  • 签到天数: 6 天

    [LV.2]筑基

    114#
    发表于 2021-10-3 01:23:22 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-10-2 22:20
    你人在北美,应该懂得什么叫做DPA,多说无益。

    你要多说点,不宣泄宣泄,怕你憋出内伤。
    回复 支持 1 反对 0

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    113#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-10-2 22:20:53 | 只看该作者
    indy 发表于 2021-10-2 08:52
    一个案子只有guilty和innocent两个结果 。。现在根本就没有进入庭审阶段,孟说的很清楚plea no guilty而 ...

    你人在北美,应该懂得什么叫做DPA,多说无益。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情

    2022-1-1 00:00
  • 签到天数: 793 天

    [LV.10]大乘

    112#
    发表于 2021-10-2 21:52:50 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-10-2 07:14
    美国没保密,保密的是天朝的网上万里长城。华为自己都说了,孟的供词如何如何。假使孟没承认的话,华为的 ...

    一个案子只有guilty和innocent两个结果 。。现在根本就没有进入庭审阶段,孟说的很清楚plea no guilty而且孟这个案子基本上就这样结了。。。米国人都move on啦老兵你到底还在纠结啥
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    111#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-10-2 20:14:35 | 只看该作者
    exprade 发表于 2021-10-2 06:21
    如果有什么交易,美国有必要为中国保密,不早泄密给某家媒体铺天盖地报道,何至于现在舆论这么被动?
    两 ...

    美国没保密,保密的是天朝的网上万里长城。华为自己都说了,孟的供词如何如何。假使孟没承认的话,华为的文字依据是啥?
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情

    2016-8-25 23:25
  • 签到天数: 6 天

    [LV.2]筑基

    110#
    发表于 2021-10-2 19:21:16 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-9-28 00:22
    DPA了解一下,要是她没认错的话,能有这东西出来?中国媒体玩的是她没认罪,刻意忽略她认错了。在北美的 ...

    如果有什么交易,美国有必要为中国保密,不早泄密给某家媒体铺天盖地报道,何至于现在舆论这么被动?
    两岸猿声啼不住,轻舟已过万重山。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    109#
    发表于 2021-9-28 10:57:35 | 只看该作者
    机器猫 发表于 2021-9-28 00:22
    不明白为啥大家管孟晚舟叫“长公主”
    长公主在历史上一般都是皇帝的姐妹的封号啊 ...

    1911年,名义上的皇帝被打倒了。。。就不要在意细节了。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    108#
    发表于 2021-9-28 10:54:32 | 只看该作者
    机器猫 发表于 2021-9-28 02:30
    不不不,我的意思是在这件事上,领导并不在乎大家能不能看见实际发生了什么。不让看只是惯性使然而已
    ...

    哈哈,我也觉得老兵在这件事情上钻牛角尖了。估计是对墙反感。
    以国内目前的氛围,老百姓不会被引导到老兵说的可能性。。。因为存在2点:
    一,中国不承认美国的司法管辖权,不认美国的那套司法程序,所以,我承认了,你能耐我何,咬我啊,反而彰显了英雄气质,磊落的胸襟。
    二,从历史上看,试问世界上有几个国家能从美帝手中把人捞回来的?再对比一下阿尔斯通案,一下子就更衬托了我国的强大。
    结合一,只会自豪感再加10点。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    107#
    发表于 2021-9-28 04:18:41 | 只看该作者
    海的故乡 发表于 2021-9-27 13:34
    这件事情对美国的伤害非常大。
    简单点捋一下脉络:
    1,美国先立法,任何人同伊朗做生意都是违法(咱先不说 ...

    我看到的东西是这样,不是美国不许中国和伊朗做生意的问题,而是华为做出承诺,不把美国的东西(HP的受限设备)卖到伊朗,才同意华为采购。结果华为是答应了,但是从美国采购的设备依然用在伊朗项目上。整个事情是这样引起的,孟在商务谈判中是华为方(或代理商)的负责人。总之由于孟,汇丰,伊朗等等造成了汇丰被罚款19个亿还是多少美元,据说是当时史上最大罚款。

    伊朗作为一个大国,和世界各地当然有经济来往,美国不会傻到不同意第三国和伊朗做生意。美国是不同意把美国的某些产品用到伊朗,而且华为在采购前还答应了。孟在很大程度上促成了这个交易。

    点评

    涨姿势: 5.0
    涨姿势: 5
      发表于 2021-9-28 09:03
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2020-2-8 10:08
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    106#
    发表于 2021-9-28 02:30:20 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-9-28 02:10
    咱俩说的是两回事,我说的是天朝可笑,以为大家都是墙内的,看不到实际上发生些什么。 ...

    不不不,我的意思是在这件事上,领导并不在乎大家能不能看见实际发生了什么。不让看只是惯性使然而已
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    105#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-9-28 02:10:58 | 只看该作者
    机器猫 发表于 2021-9-27 11:43
    你没明白我在说啥。我不是在讨论事实如何。我只是指出你有点自相矛盾

    按照你的说法,没有民意,所以其实 ...

    咱俩说的是两回事,我说的是天朝可笑,以为大家都是墙内的,看不到实际上发生些什么。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2020-2-8 10:08
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    104#
    发表于 2021-9-28 00:43:43 | 只看该作者
    本帖最后由 机器猫 于 2021-9-28 00:57 编辑
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-9-28 00:35
    这就是墙内外的区别了。墙内一片欢腾,美国输了;墙外一片嘲笑,她承认了。有墙隔着,不服的倒霉,谁在乎 ...


    你没明白我在说啥。我不是在讨论事实如何。我只是指出你有点自相矛盾
    这里是否犯罪不重要,重要的是你承认了。孟的形象可是在不承认这个基础上建立起来的,现在一旦这个事实被

    按照你的说法,没有民意,所以其实她的“形象”很重要吗?唯一重要的是在领导心中的形象。
    而领导肯定是知道她到底说了啥的,没有“泄露了会怎样”一说

    唯一的恶果是从此领导手里有了把柄,哪天要翻脸的时候就可以拿出来“泄露”了
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    103#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-9-28 00:35:57 | 只看该作者
    机器猫 发表于 2021-9-27 11:31
    那她回国后关于她说了啥的事情泄露出去的后果,显然也是领导说了算了。所以泄露不泄露都一样
    你不会认为 ...

    这就是墙内外的区别了。墙内一片欢腾,美国输了;墙外一片嘲笑,她承认了。有墙隔着,不服的倒霉,谁在乎?

    至于你说的接她回国的人,组织的人难道不懂得什么该说什么不该说?他们是咋混的?

    不要说国内了,北美公司上班的都知道,绝对不能说本公司的坏话,否则等着倒霉吧。这里,言论自由是不存在的。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2020-2-8 10:08
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    102#
    发表于 2021-9-28 00:31:01 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-9-28 00:22
    DPA了解一下,要是她没认错的话,能有这东西出来?中国媒体玩的是她没认罪,刻意忽略她认错了。在北美的 ...


    那她回国后关于她说了啥的事情泄露出去的后果,显然也是领导说了算了。所以泄露不泄露都一样
    你不会认为接她回国的人,不知道她到底说了啥吧?
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    101#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-9-28 00:22:38 | 只看该作者
    机器猫 发表于 2021-9-27 11:14
    老兵啊,这点我觉得你想岔了。现在中国的民意本来就是“美国不许中国公司跟伊朗做生意是没道理的”,所以 ...

    DPA了解一下,要是她没认错的话,能有这东西出来?中国媒体玩的是她没认罪,刻意忽略她认错了。在北美的法律体系里,认错与认罪是两回事。而孟一直坚持的就是她没错,因此只要她认错了,在北美体系里她就是输了,虽然在天朝的文字里她赢了。

    至于中国民意,一党专制、严厉的舆论控制加上网上的万里长城,就不要扯什么民意了吧。否则我在头条的ID,仅仅因为回答了一个问题,美国要是不还欠中国的钱怎么办,不符合对方的需要,我的回答是你怎么认为人家一定会还呢?结果就被弄成了数字ID,很多事情参与不了的。就这样的环境,啥叫民意?
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2020-2-8 10:08
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    100#
    发表于 2021-9-28 00:22:17 | 只看该作者
    zilewang 发表于 2021-9-26 17:35
    应该就是这样了。
    较真起来,美国手里还握着劫材。未来就看长公主的这份口供美国怎么用,华为怎么应对了 ...

    不明白为啥大家管孟晚舟叫“长公主”
    长公主在历史上一般都是皇帝的姐妹的封号啊
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2020-2-8 10:08
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    [LV.1]炼气

    99#
    发表于 2021-9-28 00:14:09 | 只看该作者
    老兵帅客 发表于 2021-9-25 06:47
    这里是否犯罪不重要,重要的是你承认了。孟的形象可是在不承认这个基础上建立起来的,现在一旦这个事实被 ...

    老兵啊,这点我觉得你想岔了。现在中国的民意本来就是“美国不许中国公司跟伊朗做生意是没道理的”,所以孟晚舟说“我做了这些事儿,但是不认为是犯罪”是会被当做是英雄行为的
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    20 小时前
  • 签到天数: 2198 天

    [LV.Master]无

    98#
    发表于 2021-9-28 00:01:31 | 只看该作者
    石工 发表于 2021-9-27 09:04
    还真不是。加拿大就捞过一个,但属于脑袋进水那种。

    奥马尔*卡德尔,加拿大出生的阿富汗圣战小兵,二战 ...

    小白帽对于恐怖分子,都不放弃不抛弃,想尽办法捞人和讹钱。

    两相比较,一下就榨出了西装下的小来。

    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2023-1-5 00:48
  • 签到天数: 2591 天

    [LV.Master]无

    97#
     楼主| 发表于 2021-9-27 23:56:50 | 只看该作者
    面包车 发表于 2021-9-27 10:55
    唉,这个英文文本不是很复杂吧,你确认还需要机器翻译?

    好奇而已,想看看edge和chrome哪个的翻译更好一些。
    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|网站错误报告|爱吱声   

    GMT+8, 2024-5-8 21:40 , Processed in 0.047866 second(s), 20 queries , Gzip On.

    Powered by Discuz! X3.2

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表