设为首页收藏本站

爱吱声

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 10917|回复: 78
打印 上一主题 下一主题

性欲,爱情与婚姻:统一或分离?

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2022-6-19 00:00
  • 签到天数: 2264 天

    [LV.Master]无

    楼主
    发表于 2012-7-17 05:21:48 | 显示全部楼层
    草蜢 发表于 2012-7-16 15:43
    - g$ ^' n$ B. k0 j2 x5 G  H师妹还是太年轻,生活这东东需要慢慢去体会。其余滴俺不多说了,兄弟们咱们在男人帮内部讨论。{:191 ...

    - [' C  B3 _; P& t- J4 h- }but there's never ever any discussion in 男人帮 about 爱情和长期关系
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2022-6-19 00:00
  • 签到天数: 2264 天

    [LV.Master]无

    沙发
    发表于 2012-7-20 04:30:28 | 显示全部楼层
    本帖最后由 煮酒正熟 于 2012-7-19 15:58 编辑
    , c% B1 `; }! z
    九九 发表于 2012-7-19 11:20 : u6 u7 j& k9 Y+ C* X' H( A4 v9 [
    大家都对不统一表示理解。问题是一方面不和谐,长期下来另外两方面或多或少就会变淡……  ...

    ; @  ]1 |0 _5 }% R$ r8 ?0 I8 B$ p5 C& C
    ok let's use a 0-100 scale to represent your degree of satisfication, with 0 being absolutely dissatisfied and 100 being extremely satisfied, for all three attributes (性欲,爱情, and attachment).
    3 O: ^, H9 {) e6 B
    % A! E, ^6 _* ]2 _9 `; F4 eThe key here is, is it really that important to maintain a super high level satisfaction for 性欲 at all time, like 100 or high 90s?  Will 85 do?  How'bout 80?
    " @8 E+ m; {/ {" I& Q& O! Y+ L% {$ {  a' P& D; M
    I guess different people would have different answers.  But the fact is, if you want a 90+ attachment, chances are you're only gonna get somewhere between 60 to 85 for 性欲.  Chances of getting 90+ for all three are slim.  Very slim.  So the question now becomes, are you happy with a 80S/90R/90A relation?  How about 70S/90R/90A?  And how about 60S/90R/90A?  Again, different people may have different preferences, as people could have different minimum score requirement on certain attribute.  And these preferences will, to some extent, influence people's decision with regards to the relation (stay or quit).
    & _4 M' y% Z" }5 w5 y! X+ s/ @1 ~
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|网站错误报告|爱吱声   

    GMT+8, 2024-6-3 23:29 , Processed in 0.037910 second(s), 20 queries , Gzip On.

    Powered by Discuz! X3.2

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表